Saturday, April 30, 2011

Amasseco



Details: Show all Hide all

Older

  • May 30, 2010
    issue 7 (scrolling long kml lists no working) reported by ran.nof   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. when uploading the example kml - the list of 2005 is very long and scrolling is needed. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expect to scroll down the list, can't do that. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? 1.1.1, windows xp, IE8 Please provide any additional information below. a solution: on function getKmlPanel: add autoScroll: true, to the kml panel. old version: ---------------------------- var kmlPanel = new Ext.FormPanel({ title: 'KML Documents', labelAlign: 'top', items: [this.kmlTreePanel, kmlUrlField] }); ----------------------------------- new version: ----------------------------------- var kmlPanel = new Ext.FormPanel({ title: 'KML Documents', labelAlign: 'top', autoScroll: true, items: [this.kmlTreePanel, kmlUrlField] }); -----------------------------
  • Nov 18, 2009
    issue 6 (Wish-list) reported by geomatrix3d   -   Not an issue but rather a 'wish-list' itme(s): 1) Add kml but leave unchecked; if adding a lot of kml's the current setup of auto-checking each added KML would bog down the map. I.E, I have a current map that loads over 90 different KML's equalling near 100,000 points if I were to have everything 'visible' at one time. 2) Fly to for added KML's: much like a current syntax for fly-to's: function getNL(kmlURL){ var nl = ge.createNetworkLink(""); var link = ge.createLink(""); link.setHref(kmlURL); nl.setLink(link); nl.setFlyToView(true); ge.getGlobe().getFeatures().appendChild(nl); return nl; }
  • Nov 09, 2009
    issue 4 (GEarthPanel in a tab panel causes plugin internal error) commented on by ntijerino   -   I have the GoogleEarth plug-in in a tab. There are other things in other tabs. All the tabs are in a parent panel. The VisibilityMode library works well for switching between tabs. But when I minimize the parent panel that the tabs are in, I get the original error. I have tried putting the "hideMode: 'nosize'" in the parent panel, but that doesn't work. Anybody have any ideas?
  • Nov 05, 2009
    issue 4 (GEarthPanel in a tab panel causes plugin internal error) commented on by powellke   -   Actually, that didn't really fix the problem it just changed the problem. I found that using the VisibilityMode plugin (http://uxdocs.theactivegroup.com/index.html?class=Ext.ux.plugin.VisibilityMode) fixed the problem. Just include the 'uxvismode.js' and then set hideMode: 'nosize' on the panel that contains the map that you're adding to the tab panel. There's still an issue if the tab that contains the map is the active tab when the app first loads. The bottom 1/4 of the map will be gray. If you resize the window, it will fix itself. One 'fix' that is discussed on the Ext forums (http://www.extjs.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-57093.html) is to initialize the Google Map when the tab is activated. But that is assuming you're using the Google Map object directly rather than using the GMapPanel. A little frustrating...
  • Nov 05, 2009
    issue 4 (GEarthPanel in a tab panel causes plugin internal error) commented on by ntijerino   -   I'm running into this too. I even tried modifying the Control Panel example by making the panel that holds the GEarthPanel collapsable, and got the same problem. So I'm pretty sure it isn't me. Did you mean you added that code to the "onEarthReady" function in the Ext.ux.GEarthPanel-1.1.js file?
  • Nov 04, 2009
    issue 5 (addKml doesn't load to kml extent if there is a lookat) reported by gmapdev   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. load a KML that has a lookat position set 2. GE doesn't auto zoom to the extent of the KML Fixed function below: // Add KML object (called by above function) addKml: function(kmlObject){ if (kmlObject) { this.earth.getFeatures().appendChild(kmlObject); this.kmlTreePanel.getRootNode().appendChild (this.treeNodeFromKml(kmlObject)); if (kmlObject.getAbstractView() !== null) this.earth.getView().setAbstractView (kmlObject.getAbstractView()); } else { alert('Bad KML'); } },
  • Sep 19, 2009
    Documentation Wiki page commented on by develop.tbp   -   Very Good i like your project , Thank you ,
  • Aug 04, 2009
    issue 4 (GEarthPanel in a tab panel causes plugin internal error) reported by powellke   -   When I place a GEarthPanel in a tab panel and switch to another tab and back to the tab containing the GEarthPanel, I get a message saying, "The Google Earth Plugin had an internal error. Try reloading the page." I thought I could fix it by changing the hideMode setting for the panel. The default hideMode is 'display'. Setting it to 'offsets' also gives the plugin error. Setting it to 'visibility' causes the panel to disappear and not show up when I switch back to the GEarthPanel tab. I was able to fix the problem by adding this to the end of the earthOnReady function: this.on('beforeHide', function() { this.earth.getWindow().setVisibility(false); }, this); this.on('beforeShow', function() { this.earth.getWindow().setVisibility(true); }, this); You must set the panel's hideMode to 'visibility'.
  • Apr 04, 2009
    r31 (Added new release version) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   Added new release version
  • Apr 04, 2009
    r30 (Tag the 1.1 release) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   Tag the 1.1 release
  • Apr 03, 2009
    issue 2 (Doesn't add kmlFeatures to the tree that are not in a kmlDoc...) commented on by ingenieroariel   -   In the createKmlTree function, change: == Old == var subNode = subNodes.item(i); switch(subNode.getType()) { case 'KmlFolder' : var node = this.treeNodeFromKml(subNode); // Recursion break; default: var node = this.createKmlTreeNode(subNode); break; } result.appendChild(node); == New == var subNode = subNodes.item(i); if ('getFeatures' in subNode){ var node = this.treeNodeFromKml(subNode); // Recursion }else{ var node = this.createKmlTreeNode(subNode); } result.appendChild(node); } return result; },
  • Jan 29, 2009
    issue 3 (dyanamic kml) reported by neerug   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1.a kml with network link which refreshes every 10 seconds 2.adding it to Google earth panel object as earthPanel.fetchKml('http://localhost:8888/gearth/test.kml'); What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? Ext.ux.GEarthPanel-1.1 , Windows xp , IE 7 Please provide any additional information below. if kml is static with folder structure every thing work fine but I want to use this control panel for dynamic kml. I have kml file wich contains a network link which refreshes every 10 seconds.The service running at this link sends back kml which is in folder structure. KML looks like <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.2"> <NetworkLink> <name>Network Link</name> <Link> <href>http://localhost:8888/gearth/test</href> <refreshMode>onInterval</refreshMode> <refreshInterval>10</refreshInterval> <viewRefreshMode>onStop</viewRefreshMode> <viewFormat>lookatlon=[lookatLon]/viewFormat> </Link> <visibility>1</visibility> </NetworkLink> </kml> when url to this kml is attached as earthPanel.fetchKml('http://localhost:8888/gearth/test.kml' it does not create any kml tree in control panel for kml coming from service. If I use kml like <Folder id="tr"> <name>tr</name> <open>0</open> <NetworkLink> <name>Network Link</name> <Link> <href>http://localhost:8888/gearth/test</href> <refreshMode>onInterval</refreshMode> <refreshInterval>1</refreshInterval> <viewRefreshMode>onStop</viewRefreshMode> <viewFormat>lookatlon=[lookatLon]</viewFormat> </Link> <visibility>1</visibility> </NetworkLink> </Folder> </kml> It creates kml tree but top level "tr" then child with name "Network Link" are created, no further folders are there which are coming from link. Can "ext-js-google-earth-api" be used for such scenario(dynamic kml)? If no is there any other extension for this?
  • Jan 15, 2009
    r29 (All files with UTF-8 encoding.) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   All files with UTF-8 encoding.
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • Jan 15, 2009
  • Jan 15, 2009
    Ext.ux.GEarthPanel-1.1.1.zip (Integrating Google Earth API With Ext JS ) file uploaded by bj...@thematicmapping.org
  • Jan 15, 2009
    r26 (Deleted thematicmapping.png) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   Deleted thematicmapping.png
  • Jan 15, 2009
    example_html Wiki page deleted by bj...@thematicmapping.org
  • Jan 15, 2009
    r24 (Deleted ext-2.2 folder) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   Deleted ext-2.2 folder
  • Jan 15, 2009
    r23 (Loading Ext JS from CacheFly + chaged Google Maps API key to...) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   Loading Ext JS from CacheFly + chaged Google Maps API key to be valid for http://ext-js-google- earth-api.googlecode.com
  • Jan 15, 2009
    r22 ([No log message]) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   [No log message]
  • Jan 12, 2009
    r21 ([No log message]) committed by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   [No log message]
  • Dec 12, 2008
    issue 2 (Doesn't add kmlFeatures to the tree that are not in a kmlDoc...) commented on by fraser.chapman   -   ...Also, really wanted to say great work! Really nice API :)
  • Dec 12, 2008
    issue 2 (Doesn't add kmlFeatures to the tree that are not in a kmlDoc...) reported by fraser.chapman   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Make a Kml file that contains a KmlFeature (eg. http://earthapi.googlepages.com/pm.kml) 2. Load the kml file using the interface What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Expect the feature to be added to the plug-in and the tree to be populated. The feature is added to the plug-in but does not show in the tree. What version of the product are you using? On what operating system? ext-js-google-earth-api 1.1, Windows XP sp3, IE7 Please provide any additional information below. If a basic feature is added to the plug-in it should be added to to the tree as a node.
  • Dec 11, 2008
    issue 1 (Kml panel ignores ListStyle declaration) reported by ingenieroariel   -   What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Load the attached kml using the kml panel 2. Look at the kml tree. What is the expected output? What do you see instead? I expect the panle to honor the ListStyle definition and appear as open or closed as indicated in the document and replacing the open and closed icon with the defined ones. And the 'hideChildren' behavior so it can be used as the layers panel in the standard google earth. You can see the expected behavior just by loading the attached kml in google earth. PD: Great work, this library completely exceeded my expectations. :)
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
    Ext.ux.GEarthPanel-1.1.zip (Integrating Google Earth API With Ext JS ) file uploaded by bj...@thematicmapping.org
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • Oct 14, 2008
    Project ext-js-google-earth-api created by bj...@thematicmapping.org   -   Integrating Google Earth API with Ext JS
 

AMASSEco


Part of complete coverage on

Solar-powered 'smart' roads could zap snow, ice


An artist's conception of engineer Scott Bursaw's proposed solar roadway, which would resist ice and snow.
An artist's conception of engineer Scott Bursaw's proposed solar roadway, which would resist ice and snow.
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Engineers are developing high-tech road surfaces to melt snow, ice
  • Federally backed Idaho engineer pitches solar-powered road made of super-glass
  • Solar surfaces could power much of the nation, cut pollution, says inventor
  • Expert: Smart roads could be tried in downtown areas of snow-prone cities
(CNN) -- The mayors of New York and Atlanta, Georgia, suffered stinging criticism for their handling of recent winter storms, but in the near future, technology could clear city streets of ice and snow -- by simply melting it away.
America's harsh winters cost the nation's economy billions of dollars each year in snow removal equipment, weather damage to streets and vehicles, extra days of school and revenue lost to closed businesses.
Scott Brusaw, a 53-year-old electrical engineer in tiny Sagle, Idaho, thinks he has a solution. So far, he's generated interest from the federal government and General Electric in his idea for a solar-powered roadway made from super-strong glass, instead of conventional asphalt or concrete.
"I'm looking out the window now at about a foot of snow, so if we can make it work here, we can make it work anywhere in the country," Brusaw said. "I'm hoping this spring we'll start laying the foundation for it right outside our building here."
Bloomberg on snow: Not business as usual
Critics: Frozen city preps come up short
Cars and pedestrians fight icy roads
Solar cells inside its glass surface would allow the roadway to act as a giant solar power generator, fueling embedded heating elements and making plows and other snow removal equipment unnecessary.
Are you snowed in? Share your stories, photos and videos
The heating elements would work "like in the rear window of your car," said the inventor, who intends to experiment with temperature settings during the next stages of the development process.
Electricity generated by the highway could be used to recharge electric vehicles and to power lights and LED warning signs along the road itself.
In fact, Brusaw believes that solar roadways -- if widely accepted -- could eventually generate clean electricity around the world, eliminating the need for fossil fuels and saving the planet from global climate change.
Marrying pavements with buildings
Brusaw is not alone in his quest to build a smarter road surface. On the other side of the country, at Massachusetts' Worcester Polytechnic Institute, civil engineer Rajib Mallick has a vision of his own.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute is trying to tap into the energy potential of asphalt.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute is trying to tap into the energy potential of asphalt.
With help from a grant from the National Science Foundation and the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, he and a group of colleagues are working to develop stronger, heat-absorbing pavements.
One idea is to embed the pavement with half-inch pipes filled with a fluid that resists freezing. In warmer weather, sun-heated fluid is stored in an insulated chamber, where it stays hot. Then, in cold weather when it's needed, that hot fluid is sent through the pipes to melt ice and snow.
"Think about it, we have more than 3 million miles of highways exposed to sunlight, so if we can harness this energy, it's free, and you don't need photovoltaic solar cells," said Mallick.
In the summer, the system could link parking lots to adjacent buildings, Mallick said, transferring heat from the asphalt to water tanks in adjacent buildings, which would save electricity.
Solar road panels would include glass layers, solar power cells, heating elements and LED road markers.
Solar road panels would include glass layers, solar power cells, heating elements and LED road markers.
"We have to stop thinking of pavements as separate from buildings," he said. "They can depend on each other as parts of a efficient system to cut energy use and costs and move toward construction of environmentally sustainable buildings and pavement."
Even a warm weather city like Miami, Florida, could benefit from temperature-regulated pavements. The Worcester project estimates that every 50 meters of pipe embedded in Miami pavement would cost $12,500 to construct, $1,000 a year to maintain and would yield enough annual energy from its heat to power 55 homes for a month.
In six years, the smart pavement would pay for itself in energy production and savings, according to research by Mallick and his colleagues.
Smart pavements offer potentially impressive savings in other ways. Alaska spends an estimated $1,600 per mile on annual repairs to ruts in roadways. Controlling the pavement temperature can prevent much of this rutting damage, Mallick said.
Three FAQs that Brusaw gets
For Brusaw, the biggest opposition so far can be summed up in a word: "Change," he said. "It scares people, I think."
-- How can glass provide enough traction while supporting the weight, wear and tear of a conventional concrete or asphalt highway? Glass, especially when fused together in layers, is stronger than most people think, said Brusaw. He said he's joined forces with top glass researchers at University of Dayton and Penn State who can develop super-strong glass that would offer vehicles the traction they need.
-- How much would the solar highway cost? Brusaw calculates an estimated cost -- in great detail -- on his website. Short answer: each mile would cost $4.4 million. Payoff? A cleaner, self-sustaining highway that would eventually pay for itself in energy production and in other ways, he said.
-- Can the solar highway's surface collect enough sunlight when it's filled with bumper-to-bumper traffic? Yes, he says. Even when roadways are filled with bumper-to-bumper traffic, solar collection would be at 50 percent, he estimates.
Federal, state support
Building and maintaining "better, faster and smarter" roads to improve safety, increase taxpayer value and to remain competitive in the global economy are some of the reasons behind the Federal Highway Administration's commitment to innovation, said agency Administrator Victor Mendez.
Change ... it scares people, I think.
--Scott Brusaw, solar roadway inventor
The FHWA gave Brusaw a $100,000 contract and the agency is supporting other smart road research across the nation. Virginia Tech is looking at using machines called piezoelectric generators to convert the weight of truck traffic on pavements into energy that powers nearby lighting signals.
Another FHWA program at the University of Nebraska Lincoln will research how hybrid solar- and wind-based generators positioned along roadsides can power highway infrastructure -- and even send extra electricity to nearby communities.
However -- after ideas like these are perfected in laboratories -- the financial and political pathway to the real world will be tricky when state and federal budgets are severely limited, said Robert E. Lang, director of University of Nevada Las Vegas' Brookings Mountain West think tank.
"There aren't a lot of revenue sources to pay for this," said Lang. Justifying the cost of installing anti-snow smart roads would be easiest in areas of high population density, Lang said, where vehicles could be charged fees for the right to use them.
As for Brusaw, he hopes to win more private and federal support by demonstrating a new prototype smart-road parking lot to be finished in the spring.
His goal would be to partner with a high-profile national chain like McDonald's or Walmart to turn their conventional parking lots into solar-powered, interactive, temperature-controlled spaces where electric-vehicle owners can recharge their cars while they shop or drive across the country.
"The Federal Highway Administration told us they're not going to let us go out on the highway to start this," said Brusaw. "They told us to go into the parking lot first, prove your technology, perfect it and learn your lessons there -- which makes sense."
Log in or sign up to comment
soundoff (718 Comments)
  • DrKdog
    Geothermo seem like a better way to go. Use the heat from the earth to melt snow
    in the winter and cool the roads in the summer and reduces expansion problems.
  • ohyeaaaahh
    Freeways could actually become free-ways.. Wireless electrical chargers for electric cars while in motion. We should buy back our solar energy companies from the oil companies in the name of anti-trust.
  • RCDC
    Will it automatically power the electric car? Just sayen....
  • Dennis0420
    I love how the people commenting on this can tell if it will work or not by reading a CNN article. This guy has been working on this for years and after reading an article many on here think they are more knowledgeable on the subject. I'm glad you are all experts in alternative energy. I think at th... more
  • asdgshadg
    Just read all these big-mouth commenters, below, pretending to be experts on the subject! All their comments are off the top of their heads, and they assume that the issues they've raised haven't already occurred to the scientists mentioned in the article.
  • jackandjill
    I have great idea that need some *research* money. I will settle for as small as 500K. The idea is, since cities like NYC are so crowded with buildings that its practical to build *roof* from one building to other building covering the entire road. Kinda subway systems without digging underneath. S... more
  • jackandjill
    Tiny logical problems 1) reconstructing roads with new super-high strength and glass is going be *huge* expense. Solar panels aren't anywhere near economical for household use, talk about paving roads 2) When there is 1 foot snow, there is no way these *smart* roads can generate any heat while cover... more
  • Dennis0420
    If the snow melts and does not collect on the road, how will they become covered?? If the roads are drained properly, I don't see a problem. As far as the roof idea goes, that's crazy. How long would it be before some idiot takes out the several supports and brings half the structure down. Talk abou... more
  • pricoguy
    This is silly! Please someone give this man a calculator! He forgets the inefficiency of solar cells. Painting roads flat black would be 5-7 times more effective than making electricity with photovoltaics and then powering heating strips. And of course we do have black roads that don't collect enoug... more
  • Dennis0420
    You are probably a descendant of the people who called the Wright brothers fools for trying to build a flying machine.
  • isison
    Dear Mr. Brusaw, just some questions:1. Solar cell panels typically have lifetime around 10-15 years. The longer lifetime, the more expansive they will be. Their efficiencies also drop over time. Do you have any solutions to replace the panels that often in a busy urban street? Did your cost reflect... more
  • toughtimes
    no way this is cost-effective.
  • pt277
    so instead of driving in snow you would be driving in water, lots and lots of water
  • Mangoe
    ...No more snow days?
    This is a horrifying idea.
  • nonamerqrd
    Before they spend our tax payer dollars on this, let's put them on the roof of our houses and get off the oil.
  • GaBoy02
    I've been thinking of this for years, but never had the funding to bring it to the table. I'm not sure about the solar panel thing. Making a road out of glass could get really slippery when it precipitates. It's more likely to come down to a chemical compound that we can add to the current mix th... more
  • xlcr
    Far cheaper to build a covered road to keep the snow off and if needed, add solar panels to the covers. Deals with that little "night time" issue.
  • GaBoy02
    Not only would that be boring at heII to drive in, it would be very dangerous. Vehicles could take out a support structure causing a collapse there by worsening an accident. Also vehicle fires spew toxic fumes that would get caught under a canopy and keep thick black smoke under there reducing vis... more
  • uunio
    I can't wait :)
  • theactivist
    Don't worry. The Wall St Oil investors and big oil Exec's will send plenty of lobbyists to Washington to fight this because it will cut into their "pie" and we can't have that. The House in congress will say that this is a "job stiffler" and will say this is a bad idea because it is bad for "busines... more
  • DMwin
    oil companies do more than just oil! they fund many different types of alternative energy projects and FYI without oil you wouldn't have a computer or a car or many of the simple things we use today.
  • goferbroke
    Yesterdays news..
  • FrankNBlunt
    Some of these ideas are plausible and already implemented, such as the piezo-electric generators that are used in walkways. However, I really doubt the ROI and expense being espoused here as well as the other uses being as effective on highways. Of course controlled areas and places not subject to... more
  • FrankNBlunt
    This idea is so dumb that it's unbelievable that it is suggested but hey, an electrical engineer needs job security. The idea that anything electric, electronic, or technology-driven is supposedly "smart" has been overused, just as "stimulus" was abused, and misleading propaganda of "green" has all... more
  • DMwin
    talk about debbie downer...he has a pilot for this idea..let's see and hope that it works!
Part of complete coverage on
updated Wed April 13, 2011
Fact check: High speed rail
Is high-speed rail a smart move -- or a waste of taxpayer dollars? Will it create jobs? Will it turn profits? Experts answer your questions.
updated Thur April 14, 2011
High-speed rail funds cut
President Obama's proposed high-speed rail network suffers a serious setback as lawmakers fight over the budget.
updated Sat February 5, 2011
Should a degree = green cards?
Amy Wilkinson: If immigrants earning science degrees got green cards, the U.S. could benefit from innovations by 70,000 people.
Where raucous culture rules
Which billion-dollar company is known for awesome employee perks and a raucous work culture? Heck, even business meetings are fun.
updated Tue February 1, 2011
Struggling town bets on sunshine
Boulder City, Nevada, is uniquely poised to cash in on a new energy boom.
updated Mon December 13, 2010
New York pauses 'fracking'
New York has haulted a controversial natural gas drilling process called hydraulic fracturing -- or "fracking" -- until July 1.
updated Tue June 22, 2010
Engineers on infrastructure: D minus
Five categories of U.S. infrastructure received a grade of D minus in 2009 from the American Society of Civil Engineers.